Brainteaser |
Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) · 0 New Messages
Brainteaser |
james |
Feb 23 2006, 01:08 PM
Post
#1
|
Group: Super Administrators Posts: 3296 Joined: 2-March 01 From: Surrey, UK Member No.: 13 |
Here's a question for you:
QUOTE "A plane is standing on a runway that can move (some sort of band conveyer). The plane moves in one direction, while the conveyer moves in the opposite direction. This conveyer has a control system that tracks the plane speed and tunes the speed of the conveyer to be exactly the same (but in the opposite direction). Can the plane take off?" A couple of links discussing it (and some funny rationalizations for peoples incorrect assumptions): www.kottke.org/06/02/plane-conveyor-belt www.straightdope.com/columns/060203.html -------------------- "We are number one, all others are number two or lower!" - The Sphinx, Mystery Men
"A computer without a Microsoft operating system is like a dog without bricks tied to its head" - annon "What a terrible thing to have lost one's mind. Or not to have a mind at all. How true that is." - Dan Quayle |
Egg Designer |
Feb 28 2006, 07:33 AM
Post
#2
|
Group: Full Members Posts: 458 Joined: 27-May 02 From: Somewhere just left of sanity Member No.: 88 |
For the love of God! Cam - read the first post about the conveyor belt counteracting the forward motion provided by the thrust of the jets, therefore making the groundspeed of the plane effectively zero, we are not debating friction or the jets ability to overcome the effects of the conveyor belt, the jets on a plane only provide thrust, not lift - as we all know - but you need speed across the ground to achieve the lift. If in the case we are looking at we take it that the surrounding air is stationary (hypothetically) A plane needs to have air moving at speed underneath its wings to take of, the above example has a planes forward motion, in theory, at zero, therfor zero lift created.
Basic physics - just the same as beating with a stick! :) -------------------- Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers of a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae.
The rset can be a total mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Fcuknig amzanig huh |
camsmith |
Feb 28 2006, 10:43 AM
Post
#3
|
Group: [RP PB] Posts: 653 Joined: 15-September 03 Member No.: 178 |
For the love of God! Cam - read the first post about the conveyor belt counteracting the forward motion provided by the thrust of the jets Basic physics - just the same as beating with a stick! :) OK, I haven't replied to this for a little while. Rory, Rory, Rory... Where do I begin. The words are NOT that the conveyor belt moves fast enough to counteract the jets... it simply moves in the opposite direction at the same speed as the plane. YOU are the one who is assuming (quite wrongly) that this is enough to counteract the forward motion. It is not. It is simply making the wheels spin twice as fast. The plane moves through the air, the ground is simply there to hold it up until the wings can take over. If you like, I could show you where to put the stick -------------------- |
Time is now: 19th January 2025 - 05:57 PM |
Content © ringerpatrol.net 2001-2007 -- Design by Designified