Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) · 0 New Messages

> Brainteaser
james
post Feb 23 2006, 01:08 PM
Post #1



Group Icon

Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 3296
Joined: 2-March 01
From: Surrey, UK
Member No.: 13



Here's a question for you:
QUOTE
"A plane is standing on a runway that can move (some sort of band conveyer). The plane moves in one direction, while the conveyer moves in the opposite direction. This conveyer has a control system that tracks the plane speed and tunes the speed of the conveyer to be exactly the same (but in the opposite direction). Can the plane take off?"


A couple of links discussing it (and some funny rationalizations for peoples incorrect assumptions):
www.kottke.org/06/02/plane-conveyor-belt
www.straightdope.com/columns/060203.html


--------------------
"We are number one, all others are number two or lower!" - The Sphinx, Mystery Men

"A computer without a Microsoft operating system is like a dog without bricks tied to its head" - annon

"What a terrible thing to have lost one's mind. Or not to have a mind at all. How true that is." - Dan Quayle

IPB Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
Egg Designer
post Feb 28 2006, 07:33 AM
Post #2



Group Icon

Group: Full Members
Posts: 458
Joined: 27-May 02
From: Somewhere just left of sanity
Member No.: 88



For the love of God! Cam - read the first post about the conveyor belt counteracting the forward motion provided by the thrust of the jets, therefore making the groundspeed of the plane effectively zero, we are not debating friction or the jets ability to overcome the effects of the conveyor belt, the jets on a plane only provide thrust, not lift - as we all know - but you need speed across the ground to achieve the lift. If in the case we are looking at we take it that the surrounding air is stationary (hypothetically) A plane needs to have air moving at speed underneath its wings to take of, the above example has a planes forward motion, in theory, at zero, therfor zero lift created.

Basic physics - just the same as beating with a stick! :)


--------------------
Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers of a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae.

The rset can be a total mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe.

Fcuknig amzanig huh
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
camsmith
post Feb 28 2006, 10:43 AM
Post #3



Group Icon

Group: [RP PB]
Posts: 653
Joined: 15-September 03
Member No.: 178



QUOTE(Egg Designer @ Feb 28 2006, 07:33 AM) *

For the love of God! Cam - read the first post about the conveyor belt counteracting the forward motion provided by the thrust of the jets

Basic physics - just the same as beating with a stick! :)


OK, I haven't replied to this for a little while.

Rory, Rory, Rory... Where do I begin.

The words are NOT that the conveyor belt moves fast enough to counteract the jets... it simply moves in the opposite direction at the same speed as the plane. YOU are the one who is assuming (quite wrongly) that this is enough to counteract the forward motion. It is not. It is simply making the wheels spin twice as fast.

The plane moves through the air, the ground is simply there to hold it up until the wings can take over.

If you like, I could show you where to put the stick devil.gif cry.gif wow.gif



--------------------
May you live as long as you want to...
... and want to as long as you live!

IPB Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
james   Brainteaser   Feb 23 2006, 01:08 PM
camsmith   Before I look up the links... Yes it can.   Feb 23 2006, 01:21 PM
james   Anyone else?   Feb 23 2006, 02:07 PM
paul   My initial thought is a big no! I can explain...   Feb 23 2006, 03:33 PM
james   Fire away! - Show your workings out and the ex...   Feb 23 2006, 04:39 PM
womble   erm quick change of mind after new logical suggest...   Feb 23 2006, 04:52 PM
camsmith   OK... My very first thought was no, but then I t...   Feb 23 2006, 04:57 PM
womble   hmmm yeah that actually sounds about it yeah that ...   Feb 23 2006, 05:14 PM
james   Yeah that's exactly it - I think what makes us...   Feb 23 2006, 05:25 PM
Sam   This is Paul - Can't be arsed to log out then ...   Feb 23 2006, 08:12 PM
Egg Designer   therefore Paul your answer is no, as the engines p...   Feb 24 2006, 12:45 AM
paul   Hence my statement of ' My initial thought is ...   Feb 24 2006, 07:46 AM
Egg Designer   ahh yes! will read closer next time, it was la...   Feb 24 2006, 08:36 AM
quaker   no it wont take off , paul has it almost right ( ...   Feb 24 2006, 09:19 AM
james   Yes it will :biggrin: Think of it like this - h...   Feb 24 2006, 10:14 AM
paul   No it wont now quiet the lot of you   Feb 24 2006, 01:35 PM
camsmith   Why, did you put the parking brake on? :biggrin: ...   Feb 24 2006, 01:55 PM
jamie   The plane aint going anywhere (until you turn off...   Feb 24 2006, 02:26 PM
james   Ok how about a different approach: Imagine you co...   Feb 24 2006, 02:31 PM
jamie   Ok how about a different approach: Imagine you c...   Feb 24 2006, 03:16 PM
camsmith   Alternatively, think about a matchbox car (I'm...   Feb 24 2006, 02:37 PM
james   The planes lift is certainly not just being caused...   Feb 24 2006, 02:40 PM
womble   I would agree with camsmith on this one. Planes do...   Feb 24 2006, 02:50 PM
Emily   I am ment to know the answer to this question havi...   Feb 24 2006, 03:16 PM
camsmith   and i dont agree with the matchbox thing the mat...   Feb 24 2006, 03:26 PM
Emily   and the argument suggests that no matter how fast ...   Feb 24 2006, 03:17 PM
jamie   James/ cam are you saying that at the exact point ...   Feb 24 2006, 03:23 PM
jamie   which was my point. AIRSPEED, not converyer speed   Feb 24 2006, 03:30 PM
camsmith   The running on a treadmill is again not a fair com...   Feb 24 2006, 03:30 PM
jamie   If the planes 'speed' is being matched and...   Feb 24 2006, 03:34 PM
camsmith   If the planes 'speed' is being matched an...   Feb 24 2006, 03:36 PM
james   Another version to help you visualise the solution...   Feb 24 2006, 03:43 PM
jamie   I think you may need to read the first post again ...   Feb 24 2006, 03:45 PM
Emily   can we leave out that plane taking off, we all kno...   Feb 24 2006, 03:51 PM
james   J - you are not understanding the difference betwe...   Feb 24 2006, 03:56 PM
Emily   i cant even think if a way to explain it but as i...   Feb 24 2006, 03:57 PM
camsmith   It's all about relative speeds... A car's...   Feb 24 2006, 03:58 PM
james   No worries hun (in case anyone wonders what we are...   Feb 24 2006, 04:00 PM
Emily   we're about to have another now that you have ...   Feb 24 2006, 04:02 PM
Doctor   My brain hurts :confused: I took one look at th...   Feb 24 2006, 04:06 PM
camsmith   I reckon we should use the treadmill, rollerblades...   Feb 24 2006, 04:18 PM
jamie   I dont feel confused, I just think youre all wrong...   Feb 24 2006, 05:13 PM
paul   A plane cannot take off without air moving over th...   Feb 25 2006, 08:20 PM
Emily   will you all LISTEN and STOP talking about the blo...   Feb 26 2006, 12:23 PM
quaker   computer says no   Feb 27 2006, 01:09 PM
Janette   *cough*   Feb 27 2006, 01:31 PM
womble   Ok this is a conversation I had from a colleague t...   Feb 28 2006, 09:19 AM
james   Rory - I've run out of ways to explain how you...   Feb 28 2006, 09:29 AM
Emily   can i ask the everyone read my post about the whee...   Feb 28 2006, 09:36 AM
womble   Yeah id guess that close to how it works Em. As lo...   Feb 28 2006, 09:44 AM
james   I don't understand that post Mike - on a freew...   Feb 28 2006, 10:09 AM
womble   My answer was in 2 parts, one being with real phys...   Feb 28 2006, 10:16 AM
james   Well yeah I understand what you are saying but as ...   Feb 28 2006, 10:48 AM
womble   Yay you got it, its hypotheticaly what would need ...   Feb 28 2006, 10:55 AM
paul   Anyone see the footie last night?????   Feb 28 2006, 03:47 PM
womble   I bet all you saw was wedding books! :biggrin...   Feb 28 2006, 04:57 PM
quaker   big stick immenent :ph34r:   Feb 28 2006, 05:59 PM
Egg Designer   OK, I understand that forward thrust in the real w...   Mar 1 2006, 08:37 AM
james   And therein lies the rub - nowhere in the question...   Mar 1 2006, 10:39 AM


Reply to this topicStart new topic
31 User(s) are reading this topic (31 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



-   Time is now: 19th January 2025 - 05:57 PM

Content © ringerpatrol.net 2001-2007 -- Design by Designified

www.designified.com